PPF vs NPS vs Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana: Which Government Savings Scheme Fits Your Goal?

Written by

in

PPF, NPS and Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana all show up on the same “best tax-saving investments” lists, and it’s easy to assume they’re interchangeable Section 80C boxes to tick. They’re not. Each one is built for a different job — one guarantees a fixed return, one is market-linked and retirement-specific, and one only exists if you have a daughter. Picking the wrong one doesn’t cost you money exactly, but it does mean locking funds into a scheme that isn’t actually matched to your goal, sometimes for 15-21 years.

PPF: fixed, guaranteed, for anyone

Public Provident Fund pays a government-set rate — currently 7.1% p.a., unchanged since April 2020 — compounded annually, with zero market exposure. You can open one at any age, deposit up to ₹1,50,000 a year, and the entire thing is EEE: your contribution, the interest, and the maturity amount are all tax-free. The trade-off is a 15-year lock-in (extendable in 5-year blocks) and a return that won’t beat equity over the long run. PPF is the right tool when you want capital preservation with a tax break, not growth. Run your own numbers on the PPF Calculator.

NPS: market-linked, retirement-only, more flexible than it used to be

National Pension System money is invested in a mix of equity, corporate bonds and government securities that you choose, so your return isn’t fixed — it’s tied to market performance, typically planned around a long-term 9-11% assumption rather than promised. NPS is retirement-locked: you generally can’t touch it until 60. What changed recently matters: under PFRDA’s December 2025 rules, the mandatory annuity share dropped from 40% to 20% for corpuses above ₹12 lakh, and smaller corpuses (under ₹8 lakh) can now be withdrawn 100% as lump sum. It’s also the only one of the three with an extra ₹50,000 tax deduction under Section 80CCD(1B), on top of the regular 80C limit. See your projected corpus and exit split on the NPS Calculator.

Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana: the highest rate, but only for a daughter

SSY currently pays 8.2% p.a. — the highest of any small savings scheme — but eligibility is narrow: it’s only for a girl child, opened before she turns 10, with a hard cap of two accounts per family. Deposits run for the first 15 years from account opening; after that the balance just keeps compounding, untouched, until the account matures 21 years after it was opened (not 21 years after her birth — a distinction that trips a lot of parents up). Like PPF, it’s fully EEE. If SSY doesn’t apply to your situation, it simply isn’t an option — there’s no equivalent scheme for a son. Check your own numbers on the Sukanya Samriddhi Yojana Calculator.

Which one actually fits your goal

If you want a guaranteed, tax-free floor under your savings with no market risk, PPF is the default — everyone’s eligible, and 7.1% locked in beats a lot of “safe” alternatives after tax. If you’re specifically building a retirement corpus and can tolerate market swings over a 20-30 year horizon, NPS’s equity exposure and extra ₹50,000 deduction generally win on pure growth, especially now that more of the corpus can come out as lump sum. If you have a daughter under 10, SSY’s 8.2% fixed rate is difficult to beat for a goal 15-21 years out, and it doesn’t compete with PPF or NPS at all — it’s additive, not a substitute. Most households end up using two of the three, not one: PPF or NPS for retirement, SSY layered on top if there’s a daughter to plan for.

None of this replaces knowing what you actually have available to invest each month — start there with the Net Salary / Take-Home Pay Calculator, then split what’s left across whichever of these three schemes actually match your goals. For the fuller picture of what else YogiCalc covers, see Introducing YogiCalc.

Don’t see a calculator for a scheme you’re comparing? Request a calculator and we’ll build it.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *